На матеріалі словосполучень української мови XVI–XVIII ст. висвітлено основні поняття комбінаторної лінгвістики «сполучуваність» і «комбінаторика», подано коротку їх характеристику. На прикладах із пам’яток проілюстровано особливості лексико-семантичної, синтаксичної та стилістичної сполучуваності.
1. Apresian, T. Yu., & Apresian, Yu. D. (1970). O forme predstavlenyia smyslovykh sviazei slova. Inostrannye yazyki v shkole, 4, 15 [in Russian].
2. Apresian, Yu. D. (1962). Dystributivnyi analyz znachenyi i strukturnye semantycheskye polia. Leksykohrafycheskyi sbornyk, 5, 81 [in Russian].
3. Apresian, Yu. D. (1995). Izbrannye trudy (Vol. 1). Moscow [in Russian].
4. Arkhypova, N. H. (2000). Sochetaemost slova v leksykohrafycheskom opysanii. Moscow [in Russian].
5. Balko, M. V. (2004). Semantyko-syntaksychni i strukturni aspekty tsilisnykh slovospoluchen suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy. [Semantic-syntactic and structural aspects of holistic phrases in modern Ukrainian]. (Extended abstract of Candidate's thesis). Donetsk [in Ukrainian].
6. Balko, M. V. Slovospoluchennia yak odynytsia dynamichnoho syntaksysu. Retrieved from http://www.Nchnpu_10_2011_8_20.pdf [in Ukrainian].
7. Barlas, L. H. (1972). Problema sochetaemosti slov v stilisticheskom aspekte. Sintaksicheskie sviazi i otnosheniia, 38–39 [in Russian].
8. Dydyk-Meush, H. M. (2018). Kombinatoryka v ukrainskii movi XVI–XVIII stolit: teoriia, praktyka, slovnyk (adiektyvno-substantyvni slovospoluchennia). [Combinatorics in the Ukrainian language of the XVI-XVII centuries: theory, practice, vocabulary]. (Extended abstract of Doctor's thesis). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
9. Dydyk-Meush, H. M. (2018). Kombinatoryka v ukrainskii movi XVI–XVIII stolit: teoriia, praktyka, slovnyk: monohrafiia. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
10. Hak, V. H. (1971). Semanticheskaia struktura slova kak komponent semanticheskoi struktury vyskazyvaniia. Semanticheskaia struktura slova. Psikholinhvisticheskie issledovaniia, 78–79 [in Russian].
11. Hak, V. H. (1972). K probleme semanticheskoi syntahmatiki. Problemy strukturnoi linhvistiki. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
12. Halliday, M. (1984). The Semiotics of Culture and Language. London: Pinter [in English].
13. Hudavychius, A. (1987). O sintahmaticheskom podkhode k analizu znachenii. KALBOTYRA XXXVIII (2): Yazykoznanie. Problemy russkoho i vostochnoslavianskoho yazykoznaniia, 5–13 [in Russian].
14. Kocherhan, M. P. (1980). Slovo i kontekst. Leksychna spoluchuvanist i znachennia slova. Lviv [in Ukrainian].
15. Kotelova, N. Z. (1975). Znachenie slova i eho sochetaemost (k formalizatsyi v yazykoznanii). Lenynhrad: Nauka [in Russian].
16. Morkovkyn, V. V. (1990). Osnovy teorii uchebnoi leksikohrafii. [Fundamentals of the theory of educational lexicography]. (Extended abstract of Doctor's thesis). Moscow [in Russian].
17. Palmer, F. (1982). Semantics. A new outline. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola [in Russian].
18. Shcherba, L. V. (2004). Yazykovaia sistema i rechevaia deiatelnost. Moscow: Edytoryal [in Russian].
19. Vlavatskaia, M. V. (2011). Sochetaemost kak faktor aktualizatsyi leksicheskoho znacheniia slova. Izvestiia Volhohradskoho hosudarstvennoho pedahohicheskoho universiteta. Seriia: "Fylolohycheskye nauky", 59 (5), 70 [in Russian].
The relevance of the studies is due to the need for a comprehensive analysis of compatibility in the Ukrainian language according to written sources of the 16th–18th centuries; special attention is paid to the causes of the emergence and formation of combinatorial connections on the example of adjective-substantive word combinations. The study of combinatorics in the Ukrainian language of the 16th–18th centuries based on one-type phrases actualizes in the future the need to compare lexical-syntactic combinatorial changes in the Ukrainian language at different stages of its development as a necessary condition for creating a synthetic study on compatibility.
The scientific novelty of the thesis is that the first time combinatorics (compatibility) in the Ukrainian language of the 16th–18th centuries was studied comprehensively on the basis of combinatorial linguistics in combination with cognitive linguistics, substantive phrases. In this paper, for the first time, a scale of combinatorial (compositional) semantics was proposed for analyzing the compatibility in diachrony; for the first time, the principles of the combinatorial dictionary of the Ukrainian language of the 16th–18th centuries were developed.
the monuments of writing, сompatibility, сombinatorics, active compatibility, passive compatibility, phrase.
1. Apresian, T. Yu., & Apresian, Yu. D. (1970). O forme predstavlenyia smyslovykh sviazei slova. Inostrannye yazyki v shkole, 4, 15 [in Russian].
2. Apresian, Yu. D. (1962). Dystributivnyi analyz znachenyi i strukturnye semantycheskye polia. Leksykohrafycheskyi sbornyk, 5, 81 [in Russian].
3. Apresian, Yu. D. (1995). Izbrannye trudy (Vol. 1). Moscow [in Russian].
4. Arkhypova, N. H. (2000). Sochetaemost slova v leksykohrafycheskom opysanii. Moscow [in Russian].
5. Balko, M. V. (2004). Semantyko-syntaksychni i strukturni aspekty tsilisnykh slovospoluchen suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy. [Semantic-syntactic and structural aspects of holistic phrases in modern Ukrainian]. (Extended abstract of Candidate's thesis). Donetsk [in Ukrainian].
6. Balko, M. V. Slovospoluchennia yak odynytsia dynamichnoho syntaksysu. Retrieved from http://www.Nchnpu_10_2011_8_20.pdf [in Ukrainian].
7. Barlas, L. H. (1972). Problema sochetaemosti slov v stilisticheskom aspekte. Sintaksicheskie sviazi i otnosheniia, 38–39 [in Russian].
8. Dydyk-Meush, H. M. (2018). Kombinatoryka v ukrainskii movi XVI–XVIII stolit: teoriia, praktyka, slovnyk (adiektyvno-substantyvni slovospoluchennia). [Combinatorics in the Ukrainian language of the XVI-XVII centuries: theory, practice, vocabulary]. (Extended abstract of Doctor's thesis). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
9. Dydyk-Meush, H. M. (2018). Kombinatoryka v ukrainskii movi XVI–XVIII stolit: teoriia, praktyka, slovnyk: monohrafiia. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
10. Hak, V. H. (1971). Semanticheskaia struktura slova kak komponent semanticheskoi struktury vyskazyvaniia. Semanticheskaia struktura slova. Psikholinhvisticheskie issledovaniia, 78–79 [in Russian].
11. Hak, V. H. (1972). K probleme semanticheskoi syntahmatiki. Problemy strukturnoi linhvistiki. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
12. Halliday, M. (1984). The Semiotics of Culture and Language. London: Pinter [in English].
13. Hudavychius, A. (1987). O sintahmaticheskom podkhode k analizu znachenii. KALBOTYRA XXXVIII (2): Yazykoznanie. Problemy russkoho i vostochnoslavianskoho yazykoznaniia, 5–13 [in Russian].
14. Kocherhan, M. P. (1980). Slovo i kontekst. Leksychna spoluchuvanist i znachennia slova. Lviv [in Ukrainian].
15. Kotelova, N. Z. (1975). Znachenie slova i eho sochetaemost (k formalizatsyi v yazykoznanii). Lenynhrad: Nauka [in Russian].
16. Morkovkyn, V. V. (1990). Osnovy teorii uchebnoi leksikohrafii. [Fundamentals of the theory of educational lexicography]. (Extended abstract of Doctor's thesis). Moscow [in Russian].
17. Palmer, F. (1982). Semantics. A new outline. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola [in Russian].
18. Shcherba, L. V. (2004). Yazykovaia sistema i rechevaia deiatelnost. Moscow: Edytoryal [in Russian].
19. Vlavatskaia, M. V. (2011). Sochetaemost kak faktor aktualizatsyi leksicheskoho znacheniia slova. Izvestiia Volhohradskoho hosudarstvennoho pedahohicheskoho universiteta. Seriia: "Fylolohycheskye nauky", 59 (5), 70 [in Russian].
Колектив Інституту українознавства ім. І. Крипя’кевича НАН України висловлює щирі співчуття директорові Інституту, доктору історичних наук, члену-кореспонденту НАН України, професору, Соляру Ігорю Ярославовичу та усій родині з приводу важкої втрати - відходу до вічності його Тата, Соляра Ярослава Петровича.
Вічна, світла і добра пам’ять!